PHARMACOTHERAPY
AND THE FUTURE OF THE DRUG WAR
A report by the Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics
Free
downloadable PDF version from the Journal of Law and Health [796 KB]
You will need
Adobe Acrobat Reader.
(Paperback,
50 pp. 150 endnotes)
June 2004, Ver. 3 (1st public version)
Law Review version: 19 (2) Journal of Law and Health (2004)
Summary |
Contents
Summary:
Over the next decade
an increasing number of new ?pharmacotherapy? medications will become
available with the potential to tremendously impact the use and abuse of
illegal drugs and the overall direction of national and international drug
policy. These pharmacotherapy medications are designed to block or
significantly reduce the ?highs? elicited by illegal drugs. Used as part of
a drug treatment program, pharmacotherapy medications may provide a valuable
aid for people seeking a chemical aid in limiting or eliminating problem
drug use. However, the tremendously politicized nature of the ?drug war,?
raises substantial concerns that in addition to those who choose to use such
medications, some people will be compelled to use them. In the absence of
extraordinary circumstances, governmental action compelling a person to use
a pharmacotherapy drug would violate a number of constitutional guarantees
and other legal rights protecting people from forced medical
treatment. Among the rights potentially implicated by compulsory use of
pharmacotherapy drugs are the right to informed consent, the right to bodily
integrity and privacy, the protection against cruel and unusual punishment,
and the right to freedom of thought.
Contents:
INTRODUCTION
SECTION
I
1.1 FROM DEMAND
REDUCTION TO DESIRE REDUCTION
1.2 PHARMACOTHERAPY
DRUGS
a) Receptor Blockers
b) Molecule Binders
c) Metabolism Modifiers
1.21 TARGET:
OPIATES
1.22 TARGET:
COCAINE
1.23 TARGET:
MARIJUANA
1.24
TARGETING LEGAL DRUGS
a)
Target: Nicotine
b) Target: Alcohol
1.3 PHARMACOTHERAPY
DRUGS: GOOD, BAD OR BOTH?
SECTION
II
2.1 FROM DRUG WAR TO
DRUG EPIDEMIC
2.2 NEUROCOPS: FROM VOLUNTARY TO COMPULSORY TREATMENT
2.21
PRISONERS, PAROLEES, AND
PROBATIONERS
a) "Chemical Castration": A
case study in criminal justice
2.22 PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS
a) Public School Children
b) Welfare and other Public Aid
c) Norplant ? :
A case study in public assistance
SECTION
III
3.1 CONSTITUTIONAL AND
OTHER LEGAL CONCERNSM
3.2 THE RIGHT TO
INFORMED CONSENT
3.21
PRISONERS
3.22
PROBATIONERS
3.23 PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS
a) Reimbursing Voluntary
Pharmacotherapy
b) Financial Incentive to
Undergo Pharmacotherapy
c) Conditioning Public Benefits
on Pharmacotherapy
3.3 CRUEL AND UNUSUAL
PUNISHMENT
3.4 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
SECTION
IV
4.1 RECOMMENDATIONS
4.2 CONCLUSION
ENDNOTES
Resources
The 'Just Say No' Shot
By Stephanie Ramos, ABCNEWS.com, Aug. 19, 2004
British Experts Believe Answer to Drug Problem May Be to
Inoculate Kids
"Under a program presented to British Parliament late last month, children
in "high risk situations"? those whose family or socio-economic
circumstances might make them more susceptible to drug addictions ? would be
vaccinated against highly addictive substances like cocaine, heroin and
nicotine."
New Ways to Loosen
Addiction's Grip
By Anahad O'Connor, New York Times, Aug 3, 2004
"Although experts
acknowledge that drug abuse begins as a voluntary behavior, many argue that
at some point a perilous line is crossed.... Over the years, chemical
substitutes that mimic addictive drugs, activating the reward circuitry and
reducing cravings, have had the most success in treating addiction."
Note: This article identifies the positive
potential of pharmacotherapy drugs to help addicts, but is silent about the
risks to health and civil liberties should these drugs become mandated
through the criminal justice system or as a condition of receiving public
assistance. For more information, read our
report on pharmacotherapy.
Children to get jabs against drug
addiction
Ministers consider vaccination scheme. Heroin, cocaine and nicotine
targeted
By Sophie Goodchild and Steve Bloomfield, The Independent (UK), July
25, 2004
"Under the plans, doctors would immunise children at risk of becoming
smokers or drug users with an injection. The scheme could operate in a
similar way to the current nationwide measles, mumps and rubella vaccination
programme."
|